By Lee Carter, Director & Costs Draftsman 
 
FOR cases where infants, children or protected parties are involved, solicitors can now benefit from a far greater degree of clarity with regards to Costs. 
 
As they are under 18, the law states that The Court has to approve any damages settlement for infant cases. 
 
Once sums have been agreed, The Court opens a bank account (similar to a Trust) where all monies can be held until the child turns 18. The same principle applies for some protected parties and people without mental capacity. 
 
Basically, it’s a process which is undertaken to protect their best financial interests. 
 
If a Solicitor has agreed with the client to take a “success fee” (typically 25%) from any damage’s agreement, the Court needs to approve this deduction from the final damage’s settlement. It is the Court’s responsibility to arrange for the Solicitor to be paid from the trust account. 
 
Having seen Andrew Gordon-Saker, a Senior Costs Judge, issue a practice note which sets out the exact procedure to be followed, it would appear that The Courts are receiving different types of statements and orders. 
 
In our experience, solicitors should be aware of Master Gordon-Saker’s note as it clearly sets out the procedure to be followed in the Senior Courts Costs Office, where The Court has awarded costs to a child (or protected party) and where parties have reached agreement on the amount owed by the paying party. 
 
In practical terms, the practice note is helpful as it states how Solicitors should set out what they are asking for and it explains how to request the deduction. 
 
Some of the key points are highlighted below and there are also four useful application templates contained in the Appendix. 
 
Should you require assistance with any of these fundamentally important areas, please call 01482 534567 for professional independent advice. 
 
PRACTICE NOTE BY THE SENIOR COSTS JUDGE MASTER ANDREW GORDON-SAKER - APPROVAL OF COSTS SETTLEMENTS, ASSESSMENTS UNDER CPR 46.4(2) AND DEDUCTIONS FROM DAMAGES CHILDREN AND PROTECTED PARTIES 
 
1. This note sets out the procedure to be followed in the Senior Courts Costs Office where the court has awarded costs to a child or a protected party and the parties have subsequently reached agreement as to the amount to be paid by the paying party (normally, the Defendant). 
 
2. CPR 21.10 provides that, where a claim is made on behalf of a child or protected party, no settlement, compromise or payment in respect of that claim shall be valid without the approval of the court. 
 
3. CPR 46.4(2)(a) provides that where money is ordered or agreed to be paid to, or for the benefit of, a child or protected party, the court must order a detailed assessment of the costs payable by, or out of money belonging to, the child or protected party (in other words, the costs and disbursements payable to the child or protected party’s legal representatives). The amount payable to the legal representatives by the child or protected party will, by virtue of CPR 46.4(4), be limited to that amount. 
 
4. CPR 46.4(2)(b) provides that on assessing those costs the court must also assess the costs payable by the paying party (unless a Default Costs Certificate has been issued or fixed costs apply). 
 
5. CPR 46.4(5) provides that where the costs payable by the child or protected party comprise only a CFA success fee or the balance payable under a DBA, the court may direct a summary assessment. (Such costs, if incurred in respect of a child in a claim for damages for personal injury, should be assessed summarily only where the damages do not exceed £25,000: CPR 21.12(1A).) 
 
6. CPR 46.4(3) and Practice Direction 46 at paragraph 2.1 create a number of further exceptions to CPR 46.4(2), notably where the child or protected party’s legal representatives have waived any claim to costs or disbursements not recovered from the paying party or where there is no need to order detailed assessment to protect the interests of the child or protected party or their estate. 
 
7. CPR 21.12 makes parallel provision for a litigation friend, on application, to recover costs and expenses incurred on behalf of the child or protected party. Such costs and expenses must have been reasonably incurred and be reasonable in amount and will in any event be limited to the amount recovered by reference to CPR 46.4. 
 
8. Ordinarily the Court approving settlement of the claim (or awarding damages) will have incorporated in its costs order either provision for the detailed assessment of any costs claimed by the child or protected party’s representatives, or will have dispensed with detailed assessment on one or more of the grounds provided for at Practice Direction 46, paragraph 2.1. 
 
9. If the costs order does not dispense with detailed assessment as between the child or protected party and their legal representatives, then it may provide for detailed assessment subsequently to be dispensed with if the criteria set by Practice Direction 46 at paragraph 2.1 are met. 
 
10. Where the court has ordered detailed assessment, the costs payable by the paying party have subsequently been agreed and the child or protected party’s legal representatives have waived any further claim to costs, the costs settlement with the paying party can be approved under CPR 21.10. Application to the SCCO for approval should be made under CPR 23. Appendix 1 to this practice note is a model form of approval order based on waiver. 
 
11. Where the criteria set by Practice Direction 46 at paragraph 2.1 are not met but the child or protected party’s representatives seek payment only of a CFA success fee or the balance payable under a DBA (and summary 
assessment is not precluded by CPR 21.12(1A)), application to the SCCO may be made under CPR 23 for a summary assessment under CPR 46.4(5). Appendix 2 to this practice note is a model form of summary assessment order. 
 
12. Applications for orders that the court “approves” or “certifies” the payment of costs by a child or protected party to their legal representatives are unlikely to be appropriate. If the legal representatives wish to dispense with detailed assessment on one or more of the grounds set out in paragraph 2.1 of Practice Direction 47 (other than waiver of any further claim to costs) they should make an application specifying the grounds relied on. The application must be supported by evidence. 
 
13. Otherwise a request for a detailed assessment hearing must be filed in form N258 and a hearing fee paid by reference to Schedule 1, paragraph 5.2 of the Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008. 
 
14. It will not normally be necessary for the paying party to attend the detailed assessment hearing, because the receiving party’s costs will usually be assessed at the agreed amount. The court’s concern will be to assess the additional costs and disbursements claimed against the child or protected party. 
 
15. Accordingly, on filing form N258, the legal representative should notify the court that costs have been agreed with the paying party and that the purpose of the hearing will be to assess the costs and/or disbursements sought by the child or protected party’s legal representatives, and should provide a time estimate suitable for such a hearing. Appendix 3 to this practice note is a model form of directions for the hearing. 
 
16. The assessing judge is likely to take as a starting point that the hearing has been arranged for the benefit of the legal representatives and that it is not incumbent upon the child or protected party to bear the attendant costs. 
 
17. For that reason, unless the child or protected party’s litigation friend or Court of Protection deputy takes issue with the costs sought by the legal representatives and participates in the detailed assessment of those costs, the court is likely to make no order as to the costs of the detailed assessment process beyond any figure agreed with the paying party. 
 
18. Appendix 4 to this practice note is a model form of order following detailed assessment and authorising a further payment to the child or protected party’s legal representatives. 
 
Andrew Gordon-Saker, 
Senior Costs Judge 
 
Appendix 1 
On [X-X] before Costs Judge [X-X] sitting in Court [X-X] at The Royal Courts of 
Justice, Strand, London 
UPON the settlement of the costs between the parties 
AND UPON the Claimant’s solicitors waiving any claim against the Claimant 
or any other person for costs and disbursements not recovered from the Defendant 
IT IS ORDERED THAT:- 
1. The settlement of costs between the parties at £ [X-X] inclusive of interest 
and costs of assessment, is approved under CPR 21.10. 
2. The Claimant’s costs payable by the Defendant are assessed at the agreed 
figure and assessment between solicitor and client is dispensed with under 
Practice Direction 46 paragraph 2.1(b). 
 
Appendix 2 
On [X-X] before Costs Judge [X-X] sitting in Court [X-X] at The 
Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London 
UPON the application of the solicitors for the Claimant under CPR 46.4(5) 
IT IS ORDERED THAT:- 
1. The success fee/balance payable to the Claimant’s solicitors under the 
Conditional Fee Agreement/Damages Based Agreement dated [X-X] is 
assessed at [£ ]. 
2. The Claimant’s costs payable by the Defendant are assessed at [the agreed 
figure] [(inclusive of interest and the costs of detailed assessment proceedings)]. 
3. The costs and disbursements payable by the Claimant to the Claimant’s 
solicitors are limited to the sums assessed under paragraphs 1 and 2 above. 
 
Appendix 3 
On [X-X] before Costs Judge [X-X] sitting in Court [X-X] at The Royal 
Courts of Justice, Strand, London 
UPON the court being notified that the costs payable by the Defendant to the 
Claimant have been agreed 
AND UPON the court’s own initiative 
IT IS ORDERED that: 
1. The assessment of the costs payable to the Claimant by the Defendant and 
payable by, or out of money belonging to, the Claimant pursuant to CPR 
46.4(2) is listed for [X-X] with a time estimate of [X-X] (attendance by the 
Defendant is not required). 
2. [The hearing is to be held by Microsoft Teams, and the Claimant’s solicitors 
are to provide the court, at least 7 days before the hearing, with email 
addresses so that invitations may be sent to all persons attending]. 
3. The Claimant’s solicitors shall by 4 pm on [X-X] (a) provide a copy of 
this order to any appointed Deputy and Litigation friend by way of 
confirmation that they may attend the hearing if they wish, and (b) confirm to 
the court that that has been done. 
4. The Claimant’s solicitors shall file copies of the first General Order of the 
Court of Protection (if made) together with any subsequent Orders or 
Authorities relating to the claim. 
5. The Claimant’s solicitors shall at least 7 days before the hearing (i) file in 
either paper or electronic form the relevant underlying papers at the SCCO for 
Costs Judge [X-X] to whom the case is allocated; (ii) file a skeleton argument as 
to the reasonableness of the costs and disbursements sought by the Claimant’s 
solicitors in excess of those recovered from the Defendant. 
6. Where the payment of a success fee is in issue those papers will include: the 
conditional fee agreement/s, the risk assessment/s and any attendance notes 
relevant to the issue of the risk undertaken by the solicitors at the time the 
CFA was entered into. 
7. Where the cost of an ATE premium is in issue the papers should include the 
insurance certificate, a copy of the policy, any risk assessment, any relevant 
attendance notes and the advice given to the litigation friend about the policy 
and the need to take it out. 
8. The papers should also include (unless already filed) the Bill of Costs or any 
breakdown of costs which formed the basis of the negotiations between the 
parties. 
9. This Order has been made on the court’s own initiative and without a hearing. 
Any party affected by this Order may, within 7 days of its receipt, apply to the 
Court to set aside, vary or stay its terms. 
 
Appendix 4 
On [X-X] before Costs Judge [X-X] sitting in Court [X-X] at The Royal Courts of 
Justice, Strand, London 
UPON hearing [Counsel/Costs Lawyer] for the Claimant’s Solicitors 
AND UPON the Court noting that the Claimant and Defendant have agreed 
the costs payable pursuant to the Order of [X-X] dated [X-X] in the sum of [X-X] [(inclusive of interest and the costs of detailed assessment proceedings)] 
AND UPON the Court carrying out a solicitor and own client assessment 
pursuant to CPR 46.4(2)(a) 
AND UPON the Claimant’s Litigation Friend [and Deputy] confirming that 
[they] do not wish to attend the hearing on [X-X] 
IT IS ORDERED THAT:- 
(1) The costs payable to the Claimant by the Defendant are assessed in the 
agreed sum. 
(2) Pursuant to CPR 46.4(4), the Court certifies the further sum of [X-X] as 
payable by the Claimant (protected party) to his/her Solicitors. 
(3) The Claimant’s Deputy [X-X] has permission to release, within 28 days, 
the sum of [X-X] for such payment from funds currently held on client account to 
[X-X]. 
 
Share this post:

Leave a comment: 

Our site uses cookies. For more information, see our cookie policy. Accept cookies and close
Reject cookies Manage settings